Monday, June 20, 2005

1/2 SUMMER IS OVER

Well, progress!

First, a collective sigh of relief by all the cohort for Summer 2005 as we finish the Keating's bootcamp! This was a lot of work… [caution future teachers] but overall, productive if you wish to be a jongleur !

Second, I just got news that CSET Section II on US History is now history – I passed!

Third, I got accepted into the BCLAD portion of the program…

Overall good progress…but the beat goes one – summer continues – next is EDSS 511 the remaining lectures and the masochistic time compression! Ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Hey – put it in perspective – this too will pass!


“¿No que no?”

Sunday, June 05, 2005

AND THE TIME KEEPS ROLLING BY!

Weeks are rolling by! May is over and we are chipping away at June. The cohort program now becomes a bit clearer (the fog has not totally lifted) but the team building is interesting as a paradigm to learn how to teach. By force we have had to intersect with others in the group, by force we have had to learn more about our styles and preferences, by force we are learning to know each other’s strengths and weaknesses, by force we are uniting as a team. I say by force because that is how you get through the class – but, interestingly enough the pressure to produce and perform as a group has “forced” us to be stressed beyond our comfort zone and things are getting done – and of relatively high quality… I think the paradigm is working…. I personally find the group work easier at times and at other times harder depending on partnering – which is natural…

There are some awesome incredibly creative people in our cohort….

Friday, May 27, 2005

GROKKER

Grok is a relatively new term that has crept into our language: it means to know something so well that it becomes part of oneself of our makeup. It comes from Robert Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land - it is a Martian word!

Anyway, a product called Grokker has come into being and is now available on the web to do searches – that visually gives you a comprehensive view of a search emulating the “Grok” experience. Very interesting…. Check it out:


Saturday, May 21, 2005

CSET Section II US History

Well, well, well - this is my third test in the credentialing series (second in the CSET Series) with one more test to go in July. This one covered US History - after 39 multiple choice questions and 3 essay questions - I was burned out but happy after the 3 1/2 hours it took me to complete the test! Overall I actually think I did ok - I knew the answers to most of the questions - nailed the first long essay, and did ok (I pray) on the second two essays. We shall see.

Now what kind of questions? The usual stuff but tricky in many ways. For example you had better know about Andrew Jackson and his exercise of power against the Nullification of Tariffs, and of course the influence of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois and their influence on the US in the 20th century - comparing and contrasting their philosophies and approaches - likewise you had better be familiar with the transportation systems and urbanization patterns. In a similar manner, immigration patters.

Well a good effort deserves a reward: Charito and I went out to dinner at our favorite spot and sipped some wine while listened to wonderful flamenco guitar all the while enjoying a wonderful chicken Chimi Churri - an Argentinean dish out of this world! Yumm.... The chef is just excellent. Capped of course with a cup of excellent coffee and a desert! By the way and just in case, the name of the place? Friar's Folly in San Marcos – see the link below:


Thursday, May 19, 2005

IN THE BEGINNING...

Here we go!


Busy day: took the Spanish test as required to be admitted into the teaching credentialing program with a BCLAD option. The test asked you to record your answers in a cassette after watching a video. Simple things – working up to, “Should an HIV positive child be allowed to remain in school?”, to, “What you think of re-incarnation?”, leading up to, “should US troops be used outside the US like in Somalia?” Yeah, yeah – don’t ask.

The written part was relatively simple – it asked you to write a letter to a school district in Northern California and discuss the philosophy of teaching in a bilingual environment plus a discussion of strengths, weaknesses, salary, etc.

We shall see – I have been told it will be three weeks to get results.


Today is the first and formal day of Orientation for the Summer Session – it is the actual day when I can say I began the program in earnest. Met Pat Stall, and Joe Keating – very nice individuals – both PhDs and experienced teachers. What they presented today was encouraging as an overview. They actually had us do practical exercises to remember kids names – by practicing among ourselves – nice game:

Name tags
Circle arrangement
Outside exercise – toss toys to each other while calling their names
Repeat exercise – faster and faster..

We were given a list of attributes that excellent teachers possess – and we were asked to evaluate ourselves in this context to see what we need to work on. Interesting.

My cohorts number about 25.

Thursday, May 12, 2005

HISTORY AND MATH

History and Mathematics intersect:

...from a medieval European military handbook.

An army wishes to scale a 24-foot high castle turret. If the turret lies across an 18-foot wide moat, how long must the army’s ladder be?

...from the Cairo Papyrus, an Egyptian mathematical papyrus dating from about 300 BCE.

A ladder of length 10 cubits leans against a wall. If the foot of the ladder stands 6 cubits from the wall, how high up the wall does the ladder reach?

...from an ancient Mesopotamian clay tablet from the Old Babylonian period (1900-1600 BCE).

A beam of length 30 units stands vertically against a wall. As the top of the beam slides down the wall, the bottom of the beam slides away from the wall. If the top of the beam slides 6 units down the wall, how far does the bottom of the beam slide away from the wall?

Here is the link:

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

STUDENTS AND TEACHER PRESENTATIONS

Microsoft just released new templates for PowerPoint that address educational topics - Check it out!

ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO

It is always exciting (and at times frustrating) using new technology – but many times it is worth it! TaskStream is a web sites designed to help build electronic portfolios. Actually it can do a lot more than that...! But for now...

It is a subscription service that gives the individual and the school to way of running a folio assessment program. A folio assessment programs offer online tracking and evaluation of responses to pre-defined requirements within a participant submission portfolio. It uses the Directed Response Folio (DRF) as its key element – these are templates created by the university coordinators that define the program requirements plus scoring.

The idea is to have each participating student create his or her own DRF from the template with proper responses.

Ideally when all is said and done – the student will have a comprehensive set of artifacts and folios and reflections illustrating the extent of their understanding in fulfilling the the Teacher Performance Expectation (TPE) competencies.

Here is mine with the Educ 422 information fulfilling TPE 14 – take a peek:

Saturday, April 30, 2005

JOURNAL WEEK 14

The EvaluTech: Evaluation Criteria Review page given to us for review this week is part of the Southern Regional Educational Board (SREB) which is the nation’s first interstate compact for education, founded in 1948. Its goals as stated in their “About SREB” states, “SREB assists state leaders by directing attention to key education issues; collecting, compiling and analyzing comparable data; and conducting broad studies and initiating discussions that help states and institutions form long-range plans, actions and policy proposals.” Within this context then, the Evaluation Criteria Review has a specific functions, “Support teachers by providing up-to-date, reliable and useful resources and information..” additionally, “[its purpose is] to create an online, keyword-searchable database of reviews of instructional materials…” The site seems practical in that it provides comprehensive criteria of evaluating: computer courseware, CD ROMs, Web Sites, On-line courses, Video Disks, Web Portals, it also includes non-techinical topics such as criteria for evaluating Fiction Books, Non-Fiction Books. It provides other link information for many sites that provide information on software evaluation and criteria consideration. I explored a bit and found the “Online Course Evaluation Project (OCEP)” very insightful – I was particularly struck by the AP US History 1 module.

The obvious use and value to a teacher is that such a site is a wealth of information on the availability of technical information about a multitude of software and it provides the criteria to evaluate other things perhaps we would consider as teacher. The idea of the is exactly as the SREB goal reads: assist in key education issues (technical) and make it accessible to teachers.


Sunday, April 24, 2005

HUNTINGTON MUSEUM

To illustrate the MS PhotoStory - I created a brief movie from the pictures taken by my daughter and son-in-law earlier this year. It is kind of cool what you can do in an instant with the software...

Enjoy:

MCROSOFT PHOTO STORY SOFTWARE: FREE

Since the class has been heavy into multimedia - I thought I would share that Microsoft just announced MS PhotoStory 3. It allows you to produce videos off your still photograhs! It is very easy to use and I can see many uses of it in the classroom... Check it out at:

JOURNAL WEEK 13

Throughout our schooling and university experience we have been involved in some sort of group work – many times very reluctantly. On some occasions our groups were a success but many were unmitigated disasters. Many students dread the word: “Group Work”

Our latest movie production group was a beautiful example how group work should work. So based, on my experience on this fun project and others that have worked in the past and reflecting how group work might be used effectively in the classroom, I would advice future teachers to think about:

1) Group work is effective when the task at hand is too large for an individual – like making a movie, or doing an in-depth research on a topic. The unifying theme is that it is larger than the individual – either because of academics or logistics.
2) For groups to be effective they have to know each other and their strengths and weakness. This would mean that groups ought to work together on smaller projects first – to break-in the group chemistry.
3) Group assessment is important from the teacher observation and peer-to-peer observations to validate the group chemistry.
4) The groups have to receive assignments that are very clear and that they lend themselves to a division of labor – so there is shared responsibility.
5) Grading of the work has to be done in a fair and equitable manner such that the individual receives a grade and the group does as well. There has to be an emphasis that the success of the group will bring reward to every individual in the group.
6) Group effort must be reward and shown to peers and perhaps parents – the reward of a group effort is in the sharing of the results.

In any case – can you comment on what other traits successful projects have or give any advice how to effectively use group projects in the classroom?

Moving on to the article, Splicing Video into the Writing Process; it was a nice complement to the exercise expounded above. The use of a major class project production as outlined in the article by Tammy Pandina and Diane Harding illustrates the benefits of group work to the nth degree. The transformation of a classroom to utilizing the new media – is an impressive achievement. The project as described paralleled our experience in creating our class two minute video to a tee.

In addition, the production of a video as outlined by the teachers had to motivate the kids immensely as attested by the results described in the article. The groups coalesced to become effectively form teams – note that the teachers had to match kids with same skill levels – the groups were not randomly selected but rather they were assessed for equal strengths prior to group forming. Additionally, I found very interesting how closely the Digital Video Process and the Writing Process match.

The proof of the pudding was of course: what did the students learn and how effective was the film reflecting their achievements – from what I read it all had to be positive and fulfilling academically and personally. These teachers ought to be congratulated!

I found a great reference to Collaborative Learning by Barbara Gross Davis at Berkley:
  • General Strategies
  • Designing Group Work
  • Organizing Learning Groups
  • Evaluating Group Work
  • Setting up Study Teams

Check it out at:

Saturday, April 23, 2005

GEOMETRY MOST ELEGANT THEOREM

Another golden drop from Texas! This is for math teachers - it is a wonderful link created by Pat Brummet - it uses all the tools we have been discussing in class including a movie - must check out to appreciate!

Thursday, April 21, 2005

MOVIE MAKING

Last night was a hoot... congratulations to our movie making team: Thea, Bob, Ginny, Bonnie! Here is our logo:


I know that some teams had technical problems - we all feel bad about this - but I am sure you learned all the techniques professor Portacio wanted us to learn - so look at it as something that you got to put up when dealing with technology... and Mr. Portacio being a fair guy he is you will recover!

COMMUNITY

Our church: Emmanuel Faith Community Church of Escondido has Saturday April 30th ear-marked to help our community and we will be helping our public schools.

I share this information just in case you are remotely interested in helping - it is a faith ministry to our community - The schools we will be serving are: Juniper, Lincoln and Central.

Please contact Emmanuel Faith if interested at: (760)745-2541


CASTELLANO

He aquí otra joya cortesía de mi sobrina. Este enlace le va afinar su entendimiento del precioso lenguaje de Don Quijote y Sancho Panza. Inscríbase a la “Palabra del Dia” y disfrútelo!


Here is a posting of a great site for the Spanish language. It has a word of the day subscription to keep up the skills of those that love the language. Enjoy!

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION

This information comes courtesy of a wonderful peer in our class - thank you Juanita!

Here is information how the SD Co. Office of Education is involved in fostering visual literacy skills - take a peek at the quality of the program and product the students create! Amazing!

Enjoy!

Monday, April 18, 2005

CSET

Great news today... I got the e-mail from CSET:

Examination: 114 CSET Social Science Subtest I
Status: Pass

One down - two more to go....

CARTOONS - DILBERT

If you are a Dilbert addict you might want to get your daily comic via e-mai! Its called sanity in a technical world...

Enjoy!

Friday, April 15, 2005

JOURNAL WEEK 12


This was certainly one of the most interesting weeks this semester – we got to see the Mac’s video software: iMovie and actually got to see the production of a movie clip by professor Portacio. It was neat – and the reaction of the students was just as interesting – there are hams and there are NOT hams in the class! The software seems, at least on demo, easy to use and logical – in a way similar to Flash but easier to use. The smooth integration of CD music tracks along with the video and the transitions, etc. was very powerful – and I might add exciting. I can see how the kids would eat the stuff up!

The logic of the video creation process was in some ways a review for me. Last semester I took a computer animation class and I am familiar with scripting and story boarding – although the format template given to us was straight forward and interesting.

Additionally, our group interaction produced what was a real neat concept and idea how to put the project together for the filming next week. Once again proving in some ways the power of the many heads together… It was like watching the Apollo 13 movie – not quite as critical mind you – LOL – but just as powerful. The ideas came flying and we just had a great time playing out the possibilities among ourselves. I think Thea, Bob, Bonnie, Ginny and myself make a great team – I guess the production next week will tell – huh? One last comment: we all got our assignments and tasks for next week – they ranged from communications, to props, to e-mail scripts, to self-training on the software, etc. It promises to be an intensive week prior to the “shoot”!

In regards to the reading this week, Filming Compassion, I found the article interesting and revealing. For example I did not know that there was such emphasis on Service Learning in today’s curricula in public schools. I know for sure that in private schools the service learning component is key in a student’s education specially in Christian schools – what I did not realize is that it is now being done in public schools. I think this is a very good move on the part of schools.

The innovative use of video production to have the students learn about the non-profit and actually emulate a project to be done for the organization was very inventive. To think about the possibilities of what this implies: it is a job, a project, a deliverable that is due to the non-profits all created by students! The students learn about the organization and the technology. They become probably more than acquainted with the use of the camera equipment, the editing process, coordination, scripting, story boarding, etc. In addition, the interaction with the “customers” and the delivery of their product had to be beneficial to all concerned: the client, students, and teachers as well.

I also found the article’s rubric categories and expected behaviors/outcomes very comprehensive although the grading categories of Exemplary to Incomplete seemed a bit strange to me – the Incomplete gets 1 point – and the Nearly Proficient gets 2 points – does this make any sense? I guess since this is a voluntary type of effort they seem to reward the kids with one point even though they did not do a story board, their introduction was missing, the tape was poorly edited, the tape had a very poor pace, the team was uncooperative and the tape bored the audience to death – but hey its ok – they showed up! Its worth a point – don’t you think? Some of this left me with some questions? I guess real life will answer some of these questions soon enough.