OBSERVATIONS

Part of the pedagogical objectives in the College of Education is to insure that new teachers can learn by observing. The approach is to observe a classroom using a variety of lenses and toolsets that compares the observation to a set of defined effective teaching practices. The net result is that you, a) see real life practice, b) compare it to what is a theoretical effective practice and in the process, c) discern from the experience how you would better perform in your own classrooms.

The approach seems practical.

For example when you are doing general class observations, you look for learning climate, classroom management, lesson clarity, instructional variety, teacher’s task orientation, student’s engagement in the learning process, student’s success in basic academic skills, higher thought processes and performance outcomes and rate every dimension on a proper scale. For example, is the learning climate “teacher centered” or “student centered”? Or is the instructional variety “varied” or “static”? Obviously, observations can get much more focused and intense. (Reference: Borich, Observation Skills for Effective Teaching)

This week we were asked to observe our ELD II classroom (9th-12th graders) at a local High School. After completing the assignment I started to think, does this observation really paint the whole picture of the teacher and the class and the learning that goes on in that class? The more I thought about it, I had to conclude my paper with the following thought:

“…I have to say that observations are a slice in the life of a class as seen through the eyeglass of a future teacher but they, I am sure, are not always exact nor really tell how important that slice of time was in the overall context of teaching the students – so I am cognizant that only multiple observations would give a better sense of reality. This is but one recorded observation.”

May be I am getting too close to being a credentialed teacher... :)